Is retail dead?

- Image via Wikipedia
David and I recently ate breakfast at a classic diner, the kind you don’t see much of anymore: a cramped, silver rectangle which looked out of place in its surroundings. We sat on stools at the counter and placed our orders with a craggy old guy who cooked it all on a small grill while making bad jokes about “the women’s lib.”
We paid more than we would have paid at the Dunkin’ Donuts down the road, but some of it was for the experience. (And some of it was for the generous amount of real, non-frozen spinach that went into David’s omelette. But, don’t worry, this isn’t another one of my fresh food rants.)
The next day, we had an appointment with our accountant for the annual beating. The accountant asked me whether I miss my business (I owned a women’s clothing/shoes/accessories shop for years). I replied that sometimes I do, but I know I made the right decision when I decided to close at the end of 2008; frankly, I don’t understand how any small, independent retail stores are still in business, especially in the Northeast, where the weather seems to become a more formidable enemy each year. The accountant voiced his opinion that “Retail is dead,” and we all discussed how online shopping has 100% changed the game.
It has been such a fundamental shift but also one that happened so fast; we went from driving to stores to see what was available and then deciding what to buy, to knowing exactly what we want and ordering (for the best price we can find) online. The only stores which have flourished are the big-box stores like Wal-Mart, which deal in volume and can afford to give us so much of what we “need” at cheaper prices and under one roof. Stores like mine — where I had to wait for the warm, sunny weekends when the tourists would show up, and only then could I start jumping through hoops to try to impress them with my inventory and merchandising? Yeah, those stores have a major problem on their hands.
Now that I no longer own a business, I rarely go to the downtown shops, even though they are just one town over. Why? Probably for the same reasons as many of you: I don’t have much time so I don’t want to drive over there and look for a place to park, only to find that the store doesn’t have what I need or they’re out of my size. Or, they’re closed. The internet is never closed, and my stuff gets delivered to my house!
Plus, like many people, I just spend less these days. I’m more careful. I usually know exactly what I want so there’s no fun in browsing around to see what’s available that I don’t need and can’t afford.
There is, however, an opposing force and that is my desire to spend my money on things that are more special, unique, not mass-produced. This is why I think art is the best gift. And this is why I love places like Austin, TX (where I will be visiting very soon — woohoo!), where they have somehow figured out a way to keep things, in their words, weird.
Is there a way to reconcile these conflicting desires? Is it possible that the very thing that seems to be the death of mom-and-pop shops, the internet, can actually be the savior in the end? Take etsy.com as an example. Hundreds (thousands?) of artisans who would previously have been selling at craft fairs now have a global audience for their goods. Phew, I was getting all mopey there, but now I’m feeling optimistic.
As usual, I think it’s probably all about decisions. Last Christmas, I made a list of the books I wanted to buy for gifts and how much they cost on Amazon. I brought it to my local book store and told the owner that I’d rather give her the business and she matched the prices whenever possible. (I told her to order the ones where she couldn’t match the prices, too; it seemed like a good compromise.) So, moving forward, I will still buy paper towels and t-shirts at Target. But when I do go online to buy gifts, I will remember that there is a whole world beyond Amazon.com.
As David and I were finishing up at the diner, another patron sat at the counter and ordered. He mentioned to us that eating in a diner feels almost like you’re in someone’s home. I replied that I would always choose a diner over a fast-food restaurant and he concurred. Too bad we’re in the minority. I can’t help but wonder how much longer that little diner will manage to stay in business. All I can say is, next time I’m in that town, I will definitely go back.
I’m curious. Have your spending habits changed drastically in the past few years? Do you shop online, at Target-type stores, malls, or in small boutiques? Do you care whether there’s a diner around?

Television. For Kids?

- Image by Poldavo (Alex) via Flickr
It’s been a rough February over here at Casa Carrigg Cancel, for one of us in particular: the small one. Caralena started off the month with the usual winter-in-New-England cold’n'cough combo. That got super-sized into a double ear-infection with fever, and it was all capped off by the appearance of the annual Vomit Comet — which, at that point, was really adding insult to injury.
Along with school absences, midnight laundry sessions, and trips to the store for more popsicles, there’s been another big side effect of illness: We have watched more kids’ TV in the past few weeks than we usually watch in many months.
And when I say “we,” I do mean both of us; when my kid is sick, she does not want me out of her sight. Together, we watched the good, the bad, and the ugly — everything from “WordGirl” and “Martha Speaks,” to “Dora the Explorer” and “Go, Diego, Go!,” to “The Fresh Beat Band,” a show that on a never-ending loop could possibly be an alternative to waterboarding.
As the days went by in a blur, I found myself wondering things like: Did Laurie Berkner specifically choose those phenomenally dorky back-up singers so that she would seem vaguely cool? Does anyone else think that a character named Handy Manny sounds like he needs to register with the local police department? Where are Max and Ruby’s parents? And, did the sloth from “It’s a Big, Big World” just smoke a big, big fatty?
More importantly, though, I observed that while there are some really good shows for kids in the say, under-six-or-seven-year-old range, there seems to be nothing of value for kids as they get older. Why do we go from truly quality options for younger kids (“Little Bear” is a sweet show, and I haven’t even mentioned “Sesame Street!”) to All Sponge Bob, all the time?
Maybe you’re shaking your heads, thinking, “You pathetic excuse for a parent! Get rid of that idiot box! Don’t let your kid watch all that crap!” Well, for the record, I don’t plan to let her watch those yucky Disney shows where slack-jawed girls look horrified as they say things like, “Wait — you mean I just signed up for a book group?!” (I now make a point of pausing on the Disney channel if I am flipping through the channels and I swear it is always a joke like this. I also heard one girl say something like, “No wonder smart people are so grumpy!”)
But if you’ve read any of my previous posts you must know me at least a little by now. Dig it: I am an “Everything in moderation” kind of girl. So, I have got to believe that there’s a middle ground, somewhere between a Hannah Montana marathon and killing my television.
And furthermore, I like my television; it’s where I watch shows like “Top Chef,” “Modern Family,” and, lately, the Olympics. I have no problem with Caralena watching some TV at the end of a day that’s been filled with school and friends and learning and fun.
I know that as kids get older there is homework and after-school activities and less time for TV anyway, but even if you only allow your child to watch a show on Saturday evenings, it’s still an issue if there is nothing but total crap to watch.
So, I ask those of you with older children, is there really nothing out there? There is PBS Kids and Noggin’ for the younger set; how can there not be a station for the slightly older kids? (Please don’t say Disney — are we really okay with that being the only option?) Why does PBS not have shows for the slightly older kids and tweens?
Am I being grossly naive; is the answer that there is no station because, without commercial advertisers, it could not exist? Has anyone ever experimented with a model that would charge for quality kids’ programming without commercials? Am I the only one who would pay for that? Or do your older kids just watch movies?
Or did you get disgusted and actually get rid of your television? Who knows, maybe I’ll end up doing the same. For now, it’s back to our regularly scheduled February. I hope it will be illness-free from here on out. I can’t take any more of “The Fresh Beat Band.”

The Big Purge

- Image by TheTruthAbout… via Flickr
First off, do not fear — the Big Purge in question is not preceded by a food binge. I’m talking the purging of stuff, and I am obsessed. “Hoarders” is so 2009; I am currently shopping around my brilliant reality show idea: “Purgers.” (I may rethink that name.) It will feature me, at my computer, as I list items on ebay, Craig’s List and Freecycle, as well as my trips to Mailboxes Etc to ship various items. I smell daytime Emmy!
Looking back, I spent much of my 20s and 30s amassing stuff. It started with parental hand-me-downs of couches and pots and pans, and continued with wedding gifts. Once I moved into a house with an attic it was all over; I don’t think I threw away anything for the next eight years. I’m not talking mementos like photo albums or my wedding dress. More like…well, boxes of totally outdated computer manuals, for example. Rolls of promotional movie posters from when my dad owned a video store. A huge (and weirdly pornographic-looking) electric back massager. A broken antique dress form. About 8000 cassette tapes. And much, much, much more. The thing about the attic is, it’s the attic. You can just shove stuff up there, shut the door, and not deal with it!
Until you have to deal with it. When we decided to move from that particular house, my husband worked long hours and I was in charge of packing, while at home with a non-sleeping infant. During one of her rare naps, I wandered around in the attic, so sleep-deprived and so, so freaked out. What was all this stuff? Apparently, it was ours, but then why hadn’t we needed any of it in the three years we’d lived there?!
In the end, I had to hire some guys to help me throw most of it out the attic window into a pick-up truck and haul it away. Somewhere north of Boston there is a landfill with my name on it. That’s the bad news. The good news is, I vowed to never let that happen again. Years later, I’ve stayed true to that promise. See? Sometimes OCD can work to your advantage — you just have to be compulsively obsessed with the right things!
In my current house there is, literally, nothing in the attic. Okay, that’s because there’s no real floor up there, but there’s also very little in the basement, where there is a floor. The garage, I will admit, could use some work — but it’s nothing to be ashamed about, and nothing I can’t handle with a spring yard sale or freecycle session. Ooh, I think I will begin my Ode to Freecycle now.
If you are not already on freecycle, I encourage you to check it out. It makes so much sense. The basic premise is that you have things you don’t want but someone else might want, so instead of throwing things into the landfill, why not offer them up?
Signing up is a bit clunky (it’s all volunteer-run) but once you’re in, all you do is send an email to your local group, stating what the item is. Hours, if not minutes, later you will have replies from people who are willing to come pick it up, whatever “it” is — or you can meet them somewhere if you don’t want people at your house.
A few of the items I’ve given away recently on freecycle: an orange cone (like for road work), an old wallet, a bar stool, a dog crate, some men’s dress shirts. Someone is coming today to pick up a clock radio I bought at Target years ago and then didn’t like and put in a closet and found this morning.
Sure, I could put this stuff on ebay or Craig’s List, but then I would have to take photos and write good descriptions and ship things, and I’d probably end up with $30 in the end. We all know that time is money. And no one ever complains on freecycle, because it’s free.
You can also request items, which I never thought I would do but did just this morning. What made me change my mind? I asked myself, Why would I buy more plastic Littlest Pet Shop figures when, surely, there’s someone local whose kid has outgrown theirs? If I’m not happy with the free ones for whatever reason, I can always put them back on freecycle.
Other items I’ve recently seen requested: a composter, Diego party decorations, wooden shutters, women’s ice skates size 8, and a waffle iron. Ya know, I think I had all of that in my old attic.

Live to Eat: Part 2 of 2
Although I certainly didn’t mean to wait almost two months before writing the second part of Live to Eat (here’s the first part, in case you missed it), it probably worked out for the best because now I’ve had some time to give the whole “local meat only” thing a test. (Also, apparently, we are coming up on a little-known, week-long celebration of meat called, appropriately, Meat Week. How’s that for me being timely and topical?)
I’m sure that, in addition to your jobs, and dealing with winter and other stresses, you’ve been thinking of me often and wondering whether I survived on only local meat (although, I guess I wouldn’t be writing this if I hadn’t survived, so that may not be the nail-biter I was going for). You probably spent some sleepless nights, wondering whether my experiment would have a big impact on the future diet of my family. It was, frankly, rude of me to keep you out of the loop for this long.
In a nutshell: In the past eight weeks I have eaten meat probably two to three times a week (down from at least four-five servings), and I’d estimate that at least 80% of that meat was purchased at a local farm and prepared by me in my own home. Considering the major holidays that were celebrated during this time I was, frankly, impressed with myself. I was also surprised by how easy it was.
To be clear, part of why the experiment was so easy was that I was not hardcore about it. I still cooked soups and pastas with chicken stock, and a couple of times I shared entrees which contained meat and just left the meat for David. One time, when friends were over, I made a warm beet and bacon salad and it looked so good there as no way I was going to pass it up (it was, by the way, really really good — let me know if you want the recipe). And, lastly, I even totally forgot my experiment several times; I’d be socializing and perhaps drinking some wine and, without even thinking, I’d pop some meat-filled appetizer into my mouth. Whoops!
Overall, though, I’d say I decreased my meat intake by about 60%. And since I do almost all the cooking around here, David didn’t have much choice but to come along for the ride. (He does, however, hold a lot of business meetings over lunch, so for all I know he could be tearing up a rack of lamb or a Cornish game hen on a regular basis. If he is, more power to him; I’m not one to foist my experiments on anyone else.)
So, to re-cap: Blah blah blah local, blah blah blah yay me. Who cares, right? I mean, yes, I do feel a sense of satisfaction when I think about what I am not ingesting. But my diet was really quite healthy to begin with. Where we have real problems is with the diet of a certain someone else who lives here. Hint: It’s not me, or David, and it’s someone whose height is still measured in inches. And it’s not a dog.
I’ve noticed a couple of things about parents, their kids, and their kids’ diets. First, parents do not like to talk about what their kids will or will not eat; it somehow seems like a personal failure if your child does not love raw broccoli on top of brown rice. And second, once you do get the parents talking, you have opened the floodgates and you will hear some funny and some disturbing stories, many of which will involve projectile vomiting, and all of which will make you feel better.
I’ll start the true confessions. Here’s the biggee: My daughter does not like ANY vegetables. None. Not even corn-on-the-cob, not even if I melt orange cheez-product over them, no, no, none. I used to be able to sneak some in there in a meatloaf, but now that she is four+ she will examine anything on her plate — anything that is not a chicken nugget, white rice, or fruit — and point at the tiniest speak of green and say “What is THAT?” And once she has asked that question, it is over. Unless, of course, you are from that school that thinks kids should not be allowed to leave the table until they’ve eaten all the veggies. Insert projectile vomiting story here.
To make matters worse, the list of things that she will eat is constantly being edited. Example: Until recently, she would happily eat a hard-boiled egg (all “yellow part” had to be removed) but then, one day, she decided that didn’t like eggs, either. It is, conversely, rare for an item to be added to the list. This girl is stubborn like a mule (neither David nor I can figure out how that happened) and even my desperate pleas, like “ALL KIDS LIKE CORN ON THE COB!” are useless.
The point is, my daughter will not be joining the local meat experiment any time soon. We already have so many dietary constraints that I’m just happy I was able to switch her from the gross, dino-shaped nuggets to Bell and Evans. Seriously, a small triumph.
And that’s what were all about over here. The small triumphs.
[I'd love to hear about what you or your kids are eating or not eating. And, ya know, while I enjoy some parenting advice from time to time, I'm not so into it when it comes to the topic of food, since I really feel like I've tried everything and I'm doing the best I can -- and, also, that I was the same way at her age and it will all work out fine in the end -- so, if you would, please save the "Dora popsicle=child abuse" rants for one of those Moms-Being-Mean-to-Each-Other forums. There's plenty of them out there.]

Ten Good Things
Note: First thing this morning I stated that I would update my blog today. Cut to end of day: It’s New Year’s Eve, I have 45 minutes until it’s time to leave for dinner and I have not showered or changed…so, it looks like Part 2 of Live to Eat, which I was intending to write today, will have to wait for another day (another life?) when I have more time.
For now, I will take the suggestion of my friend-and-neighbor, Jonathan Sherwood, and whip together a Top Ten list. Because anyone who has ever had a writing assignment knows that it requires way less thought to write a list. And that is good news because as I write this there is a dog trying to play a game with me, and a four-year-old having a full-blown conversation with me, despite the fact that I’ve plopped her in front of Fetch with Ruff Ruffman, her new fave. So without further ado, I present to you…

Me, in Mill Valley, August 2009.
Ten Good Things from 2009
Was 2009 a flawless year? HA! Not by a long shot. There’s a lot going on behind the scenes, as I’m sure is the case with many of you – things that never get posted to Facebook or Twitter. As we get older, life gets more difficult, fraught with losses too painful for words and challenges we never knew existed. But in a way, that’s what made me write this, as a reminder of all the excellent memories and accomplishments from 2009. It could also be called Ten Things for Which I Am Really Grateful. In no particular order:
1) Trip
We had an amazing trip to California in August. We visited the north and south, spent time reconnecting with friends we hadn’t seen in years, went boogey-boarding, swam, ate good food, and relaxed. It was truly one of the best trips of my life.
2) Escape
Last February, we spent the entire month in FL and, despite the utter weirdness of that entire state, it was spectacular to escape the cold and snow and swim in the perfectly heated pool every day. Lucy the bulldog was with us, and we spent lots of time with my parents. The drives down and back were actually fun, and we saw family along the way, as well as cities like Savannah and Charleston. A total adventure.
3) Garden
While in FL, David and I both read Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, and decided to plant a garden. In the end, David did 90% of the work but I greatly enjoyed the fresh produce all summer and into the fall. It changed the way we think about food and we are already planning next summer’s garden (golden beets, anyone?).
4) Tennis
A silly one, perhaps, but fun nonetheless — David and I separately started playing tennis earlier this year (me with my parents, and David with his friend Jeff) and it’s turned out to be a fun hobby that we can also do together. I got a sweet new stick for Christmas (that’s a racquet, if you’re not up on the lingo) and we joined an indoor club. We’ve already played a few times this month and while the suckage level is quite high at this point, it’s something I look forward to continuing in 2010.
5) Cooking
Another excellent new hobby of mine! It’s funny, because, historically, I’d always hated cooking — I mean, just the list of ingredients would make my back start to spasm, never mind all that chop, chop, chopping. These days, I am on a cooking and baking tear. I’m constantly looking for new recipes and learning new things about combinations and techniques. And the pay-off comes in numerous ways: we eat better, we save money, and I have fun!
6) Writing
In 2009 I started writing again. Before film, before retail, before Caralena, writing was my true passion and I feel like I’ve reconnected with an old friend now that I’m writing again. It started with an online writing class and it continued with this (admittedly dinky) blog and an essay contest and even though I have yet to see any of my writing in print, I still find it satisfying to write. I have some Big Ideas, too, so we will see if I can make things happen in this department in 2010.
7) Izzy
On a sad note, 2009 was the year I lost my Lucy, and I still miss her all the time. I knew I could never replace Lucy, but aside from missing her specifically, I also found that after about six months I also just missed having a dog. What can I say — I just love having a four-legged friend here, lazing around and making me laugh. And despite all my claims that “my next dog will just be a pet: no sleeping on the furniture, no expensive food, no falling in love ” (me with it, that is), along came Izzy with the ridiculous spot over her eye and I was left powerless. She can be a naughty puppy for sure, but ask anyone who has met her: The Izzer is gentle and mellow and a great addition to the family.
8) Work
Oh, wait — you didn’t think I meant ME and work, did you?! Hahaha: NO. I am in early retirement. I meant David. He’s had some great professional success this year, well deserved after all his years in the trenches. He is currently the founder and CEO of his new venture, Performable, and I am really happy for him.
9) Milestones
Oh, uhm, I turned 40 this year — I guess it’s debatable whether that’s a good thing, but I think we get to choose so I’m going to say YES. David and I also had our ten-year wedding anniversary and that one is more black-and-white. (It’s good.) In addition, Caralena turned four this year and it is such a fun age. The thing about these milestones is that they make you think, about what you want and what you have and I can never think about any of that stuff without coming to the same conclusion: Man, I am lucky.
10) Friends
People can talk all they want about how FB is lame, and silly “older” people like me have taken it over to talk about our lame lives blah blah blah. I say, FB is as good as the friends you have who also use it. I have had a blast on FB this year, reconnecting with “long-lost” friends from high school and college and NYC, and receiving great recommendations on books, recipes, Christmas gifts and way more. I’ve seen new babies, heard happy and sad news, and bantered with people as if we hadn’t been out of touch for 10-20 years, and I’ve loved all of it. I look forward to hearing more from all of you soon.
Happy New Year!
Filed under Uncategorized | Comments OffLive to Eat: Part 1 of 2

- Image via Wikipedia
This morning, my four-year-old daughter asked me, “Do steaks grow on trees?” (I have since been notified by a friend that this was a “Martha Speaks” reference. If you’re not in the know, “Martha Speaks” is a PBS show about a dog who ate some alphabet soup and now can talk. It’s cute, as far as these things go.)
When I replied that, actually, steaks come from cows, she started laughing and said, “That’s the silliest thing I’ve ever heard!” Normally, this may not have jumped out at me, but her timing is very interesting (even if it is coincidental, again because of the talking dog) because she hit on a topic that has been very much on my mind lately, and that is my life as a carnivore.
But first, a few words about me and food in general:
I love food.
I love eating food, drinking food, making food, talking about food, and reading about food. I even love tweets and Facebook posts about food — it makes me happy to hear what my friends are eating, and I’ve exchanged some great recipes via Twitter and FB.
For me, the answer to the question, “Do you eat to live, or live to eat?” is so obvious that the question need not be asked. The same goes for many of my close friends, and I don’t think that is a coincidence. For me, any version of the perfect evening would necessarily include a great meal.
I’ve already written about the food-intake changes we’ve gone through over here; between our participation in a CSA (summer and winter shares now), David’s constant bread baking, my new-found love for cooking and baking, and David’s amazing garden we are on a specific path.
I guess what is happening now is a logical next step on that path, albeit a more difficult one. The issue I’m struggling with is this: If I care so much about where my produce, milk, bread, and eggs comes from and what may be sprayed all over it, how could I not care about the meat I eat?
Recent books, such as Jonathan Safran Foer’s “Eating Animals,” and recent movies, such as “Food Inc.” have stoked my fire, although, in the nature of full disclosure, I should say that I have not read or seen either work in its entirety. I almost don’t need to — just hearing Foer’s interview on WBUR’s “On Point,” or seeing the NOW interview with filmmaker Robert Kenner was enough to get me on board on a few basic points:
- When we eat “factory farm” meat (99% of all meat eaten in the US, according to Foer), we are eating meat that lived and died inhumanely, and
- we are contributing to the #1 source of global warming, and
-we are eating animals that have most likely been injected with antibiotics, and who walked around in the dark, in their own feces, stepping on other sick or dead animals.
I know: Gross. Sorry. To make it even worse, you’ll see that I’ve presented a trifecta: One ethical issue, one environmental issue, and one health issue.
To his credit, Foer does a great job (in this interview, anyway — I’ve heard him called “self-righteous” and worse in various reviews) of reminding us that there is a whole world between meat-eaters and vegetarians. (Interestingly, actress Natalie Portman read his book and immediately went vegan.)
About two weeks ago, when I decided to start working towards a diet that is free of factory farm meat, I entered this “whole world,” or gray area; I am not a vegetarian and I actually have no plans to become a vegetarian. As it is, I’m sure I eat less meat than most Americans (that’s not saying much), but when I go out I usually have a nice piece of beef or fish. I guess I won’t be doing that anymore. I didn’t even have turkey on Thanksgiving. (Yes, I realize how pathetic that sounds but it just further illustrates how meat has become so important and ubiquitous that wankers like me can skip one portion and act righteous.)
To drive home this point, Foer states, in the “On Point” interview: “”The essential question is not, ‘Is it right or wrong to eat animals?’ That is a distracting question…The important question is, ‘Is it right to do the things we’re doing? Is this farming system something we can stomach? Is it something we want to support with our money and, in effect, with our votes?’”
His real-life examples are great. He talks about how, if you knew that your neighbor had a pregnant pig in their basement, left in total darkness in a cage so small that the pig couldn’t turn even around, and it was never allowed fresh air and had never been outside, you would likely call animal control in your town. It is unlikely that you would give your neighbor some money to support the cause. (My addition: You probably wouldn’t put your name on a list to get some of the bacon, either. Remember, the pig is standing it its own poop and always has been.)
And, in case you’re wondering, the answer is yes, I do see that this is a slippery slope of ethics and opinions and misinformation. Truthfully, I have no idea what I’m doing, but I’m guessing that most vegetarians would argue that I’m not doing enough, and most average American carnivores would argue that, well, meat is delicious and I should shut up and keep eating it.
I say I haven’t eaten factory farm meat in two weeks but that’s not really true — I’ve eaten soups that are made with chicken stock. Can I really omit chicken stock? Do I have to? Of course not — I don’t have to do any of this. But now that I’ve really spent some time thinking about that nasty meat in the supermarket, I don’t think I could eat even a juicy burger without wondering what “extras” I was consuming.
Plus, I have way more choices than 99% of the world’s population. My farm stand sells meat from a local farm (you know, a place where animals walk around outside and eat grass and are not injected with drugs), so, for a premium, that is what I’ll be eating when I crave meat. And a new vegetarian take-out just opened in my town; I had a delicious stuffed pepper from there for lunch today. So, you know, I won’t go hungry (I’m sure you were concerned).
But I don’t know what to do about the chicken stock — sorry to obsess, but I use it to cook everything! And while I’m asking questions, have I ruined any restaurant meal for the rest of my life? And what do I do about the whole fish situation? Jeepers.
At this point, what I’m saying is quite simple. I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything, because I’m not that person. (And, in turn I hope that no one will try to talk to me about how, if I’m going to eat meat from the local farm , I might as well eat my own dog, because that connection is not there for me.) Who knows, maybe I will give up after two more weeks, but I doubt it; I haven’t eaten at McDonald’s in years, not since I really thought about what I was ingesting when I ate there.
For now, all I’m saying is this: I will pay attention to what I “live to eat.”
(Part 2 of 2 will bring the focus back to my daughter and her eating habits, and the inevitable discussion about chickens and chicken.)
Your Baby Definitely Can’t Read. Sorry.
I know that those of us who noticed the story were shocked – shocked! — last week, when it was widely reported that the Walt Disney Company is extending a refund program for its “Baby Einstein” videos. Apparently – and, again, I cannot stress how stunned I am by this - when babies are strapped into their little vibrating chairs and plunked in front of a television to watch these supposedly educational videos, they actually do not become geniuses.
In fact, if I had to guess what is the biggest goal achieved by the babies who watched the videos, I would say that these babies were the ones with the cleanest, most exfoliated and shiny-haired mothers. Why? Because that’s the only thing that anyone in her right mind would be looking for in a video for babies: Fifteen minutes to take a shower. And, as someone who really, really needs to take a shower every single day, I support that goal. Let’s just not make it into anything loftier than it is.
Are consumers really going to return the “Baby Einstein” DVDs for refunds? Clearly a rhetorical question – of course they are! It’s free money – I might even see if I have any left over in a drawer somewhere. And, let’s face it, I live in a country where people sue McDonald’s because they are obese. Ostensibly, all we need is to buy some products — videos, diets, creams and enhancers — and we will be rich, thin, beautiful, smart, and sexually satisfied. And if anything goes wrong, we can always sue the pants off someone.
All of which leads me to a little something knows as YBCR; or, if you’re fortunate enough to be out of this loop, Your Baby Can Read. The YBCR web site promises “enhanced learning ability” and “future success” — that last one should set off a Liberty-size warning bell, but judging by the testimonials on the web site or on Amazon, people are eating it up and I’m sure Dr. Titzer, the creator, is rolling in the dough. (My favorite comment on Amazon begins like this (the writer is referring to her baby): “He didn’t immediately take to the dvds, but after a couple of weeks of forcing him to watch them…” Forcing your baby to watch DVDs? Well, that’s just good parenting!)
The line-up of videos shows babies “reading” words aloud off of cards. Or, if they are too small to actually say the words, but so smart that they have learned how to read, they can just point to something, like their toes, and mumble something along the lines of “Tssssssoooooooh.” Genius!
Aa quick Google search reveals that even Dr. Titzer, the creator of the videos, admits that the babies in the videos are not actually reading. I hope it goes without saying (so now I will say it) that the babies have memorized the words they are “reading.” Even parents who swear by the videos admitted that their children could only, uhm, “read” the words they had learned in the program. In other words, they have no actual reading skills at all.
It’s honestly difficult to know where to begin the critique of such inanity. I guess we could start in the Land of Make Believe, by pretending the product actually works and babies — little “goo-goo, ga-ga” BABIES — can learn how to read. Might I ask what is the point is of their reading? Are they going to read your neglected New Yorkers and summarize articles for you? Are they going to get little baby jobs at the library or food store to bring in some extra diaper money? And, speaking of diapers, maybe we could flash the babies a sign that reads “If you can read this, please stop taking a dump in your pants.”
I’m no child development expert, but I am a parent and I believe that qualifies me to ask, What could possibly be the point of spending all that time with your baby, hours you will never recover, forcing them to memorize the shapes of various words? It makes me sad, and mad. Babies are supposed to learn how to point at things and pick up objects. They are supposed to laugh and babble and drool and be babies. The best thing you can do is read to them, play with them, and speak to them in your normal adult voice.
If, when they are a little older, they show a lot of interest in letters and rhyming and reading, then, sure, start sounding out those letters and playing word games! Maybe you will develop a life-long lover of books, like me (who, by the way, learned to read in first grade).
If there is any part of you that think it’d be better to put it a Your Baby Can Read DVD, here is another link for you: It’s called Ultimate Colon Cleanse, and it will rid you of internal parasites that you didn’t even know you had! It must be true because they have this amazing story on the web site, about a man who fathered children when he was 130 years old — crazy!
Ah, what the hell: Here’s a link to the Church of Scientology, too. I’m not sure why, but it just feels right.

How to Survive this Winter: A Self-Help Guide

(Our front door last winter.)
Anyone who has spoken with me for longer than eighteen seconds is aware that I have struggled with winter, in a profound way, for years now. The problem? Well, I don’t ski or snowboard (or want to), I like to go ice skating and sledding maybe once a year, I get depressed by the lack of sun, I feel claustrophobic in my house, and I become a freakishly obsessive germophobe.
While I’m sure we would all agree that I am at least somewhat charming during the other three seasons, winter transforms me into a totally miserable louse and I’m pretty sure that I make everyone around me miserable, too – and if I don’t, it’s not for lack of trying.
One might even suggest that, perhaps, New England is not the best place for me. And one is probably correct. But for numerous reasons that would probably be an entire entry of their own, I am here for at least another winter. Or two. Maybe more. I feel completely nauseous just typing that.
Knowing that this is the case, I am trying really hard to make winter less soul-crushing than in recent years. It is part of my recent campaign to Take Charge of My Life, and to start making positive decisions that are all about me, and what I want to do! It’s about synergy, it’s about re-branding, it’s about alignment and it’s about monetization. (It’s also possible that it is about none of those things.) And it all starts here, with identifying the specific issues, and then – are you even ready for this? – finding possible solutions.
It’s not going to work, you say? Yeah, you’re probably right. But what the hell am I supposed to do? It’s October 18th and my car is covered with snow. So here goes nothing. My guide on How to Survive Winter.
Problem #1: Winter seems endless and there’s nothing to do.
Solution: Schedule time and cultivate interests!
You’ve probably gathered by now that I do not hold a traditional job. If we’re going to be sticklers about labels, like “employed” and “unemployed,” I would have to say that I am the latter. I certainly have many responsibilities, but my duties are more things that can be done at various, flexible times. Come winter, I need to schedule all this free-form time. I’m talking yoga twice a week, I’m talking tennis on a regular basis, I’m talking no-cancel movie nights with friends, I’m talking self-imposed writing hours. Schedulization will make the days, weeks, and months fly by. I am certain of it. And, if not, I will at least amuse myself by using the word “schedulization.”
Problem #2: I loathe the extreme cold and darkness.
Solution: Turn on the heat!
David loves to tell people how cold I keep our house in the winter. His favorite stories are about me wearing a ski hat or a fleece jacket to bed (both true). What can I say? When I was growing up – in a house built in 1702 – and I told my mom that it was cold, she said “Put on a sweater.” When I said I was already wearing a sweater, she said, “Put on another sweater.” And that was that! I put a sweater on over my sweater! Heat became, to me, a luxury. And, I know, it is a luxury! But it is a luxury to which I have access and so, along with being very grateful that it’s there, this year I am also going to turn on the heat. In addition, we have scheduled an independent energy audit, which will likely result in the purchase of one or more of the following: a pellet stove, storm doors, blown-in insulation, those thingees that regulate radiators, or an entirely new heating system. One way or another, though, this mofo is going to be blazing this year.
Problem #3: Food options suck in winter. Weight gains abound.
Solution: Obtain good food.
We were, admittedly, spoiled this summer with David’s great garden and the summer CSA share and, once you’ve eaten that amazing, fresh food, it is very difficult to go back to pre-packaged crap and a typical all-carbs diet. So this year we have signed up for our farm’s winter share, so there will be fresh veggies all up in here, and David has also agreed to grant my wish for fresh herbs grown under the grow lights in the basement. Between that and a freezer filled with high-quality meat (which we still need to get) I will feel like we can eat the same healthy stuff that we ate, and loved, this summer, even in a blizzard. I will still be feeling all stabby when my West Coast friends tweet, in February, about riding their bikes to the farmer’s market to buy all manner of unavailable-to-me fruits but I will just have to be happy as I gnaw on my parsnip, or whatever. If they really loved me, they wouldn’t write about that stuff in the first place.
Problem #4: I become paralyzed by fear of illness.
Solution: Therapy? Medication? Hmm.
I’m not really sure what to say about this one. I’ve already decided that I will have my daughter stay home – for as long as necessary – if anything obvious is lurking at the school. I busted out the Lysol for a pre-season clean-and-spray, I bought a new thermometer, I use the free “cart wipes” at the supermarket, and I carry anti-bacterial wipes and gel in my bag. We will not go to any indoor playground/museum/playspace etc. from now until spring. This one, though, is dicey. I am definitely accepting suggestions. I have admitted that I have a problem, which, I’m told, is the first step.
Problem #5: I hate winter. See all of the above.
Solution: Plan trips to warm destinations.
I am all over this one – I have a good recommendation for a Jamaican resort, so that will cover the slightly cheesy, all-inclusive, water park trip. And then I believe there will still be room for a jaunt to the west coast, or perhaps back to Austin, or maybe south of the border? Remains to be seen. Florida will be in there somewhere, too. It is fun to plan trips and even more fun to go on them. I do plan to invest in travel insurance this year. See #4.
And, with these techniques, I do believe I will survive. As an aside, it was recently discovered that I have a vitamin-D deficiency. I am currently taking supplements but I’m going to assume that this has also played a role in my SAD. Who knows, maybe I will actually thrive – but the goal, again, is just to survive. I’d love to hear your tips.
Me & the TV
When I can tear myself away from the latest Utne Reader and when no one is available to play chess by candlelight, I do, I confess, watch an occasional program on the idiot box.
I’m exaggerating, of course. But TV just hasn’t been a big part of my life, at least not since I was young and the sitter watched her shows for the entire eight (daytime) hours that my parents were at work. Thanks to her, I could probably identify more of the women who presented the prizes on “The Price is Right,” than I could, say, actors from “Dallas,” a show which most people my age watched (on purpose, I’m pretty sure).
During grade school I watched the same stuff that everyone was watching: “Happy Days” and “Laverne and Shirley.” “The Love Boat” and “Fantasy Island” on Saturdays. Maybe some “Eight is Enough?” Nothing that really stuck with me.
My high school was a boarding school with only one TV that I remember, located in the student lounge. We had about 45 minutes of free time at night after study hall – 45 short minutes when we could hang out with friends and make out with girl/boyfriends. The TV was pretty much ignored. These were, I believe, the “Miami Vice” days. I have never seen even one episode.
In college we were too busy protesting and deconstructing and drinking to bother with much television. I do remember watching the Gulf War, which was odd, and also ”Dawson’s Creek” – but only in an ironic, anthropological kind of way, of course (again, the deconstructing). But usually we watched movies on VHS. We, like Dawson, were film majors, after all.
My years spent in New York and Boston were so busy and fun and crazy that I can only remember one show that mattered and that was “Party of Five.” Po5: So unbelievably juicy and wildly manipulative; my then-boyfriend, now-husband used to call it “Party of Crap.” I cried like a baby during the finale. And then there was “Seinfeld,” so important, so ground-breaking… I hope I never see it again.
And that brings me to the Adult Me. Adult Me is watching some TV – still, not a lot by national standards, but I do have my shows (see below) that I watch on a regular basis. But is it sad that my TV watching has ramped up in the past five-ten years?
I don’t think so, considering the degree to which the quality of programming has also skyrocketed. Of course, I devoured “The Sopranos,” the early seasons of “24,” “Lost,” and “Six Feet Under” (best series ending montage ever. EVER!). Some day, I may even delve into “The Wire,” which some male members of my family consider to be the best show of all time. I do feel, though, that it is not the right show for me right now.
These days it is more about time, or lack thereof. We only own one TV which is off during the day, but gets switched on when Caralena watches her shows (yes, my kid watches TV and although she watches some good stuff like “Word World,” she also loves annoying fluff like “Max and Ruby,” which you cannot convince me is educational. But hey, she’s busy and active all day and needs to wind down – wait! Why am I defending myself? That’s a whole other blog post, one that I probably will never write.). Basically the TV is available from 8pm until when I go to bed. Two hours later.
On the very few occasions when I do turn on the TV and just flip through the channels, I end up being either pissed off (Fox News, and all those shows about “green construction,” where annoying home owners congratulate themselves for making a backsplash out of recycled glass while never recognizing that, unless your original backsplash was made of asbestos, it actually isn’t all that “green” to tear out a bunch of stuff that was totally fine and functional), or bored (shows about people putting in a new patio or shrub, or people who have buttloads of kids), or embarrassed to be alive (“Real Housewives of Atlanta”).
All of which was a long introduction to a short list of…
Fall Shows I Am Watching:
Glee: I’m not really at a point in my life where I’m looking for a lot of heaviness in my TV entertainment – I pretty much get that from regular life – so “Glee,” for me, is just what the doctor ordered. (I am having a little OCD issue where I cannot get the songs out of my head for days, which sounds silly but when I’m screaming “Streetlights…Pee-ee-poh-oh-oh-OHL!!” in my head at 4am it’s not so fun.) The song choices so far have been spot on, and it was some great casting to pull people from Broadway who have giant singing voices. I will admit that while I love the show now, I can see how I could get tired of the one liners and (purposefully, I’m aware) cliche characters. But for now, “Glee” is on my must-see list.
Mad Men: After all that crazy promoting I thought that this season of “Mad Men” was going to be a home run. Instead it has been…odd. But that is not necessarily a bad thing. For sure, the pacing has been erratic and characters seem to be featured and then suddenly dropped (like Joan – I want more Joan!), but hopefully it’ll all come together a little more in the weeks to come. I get that everyone is unsettled at Sterling Cooper and in their private lives but things have been eerily somber. If Don Draper’s world crashes around him, the show will either crash and burn or go to the next level. Remains to be seen.
Project Runway: For the most part, “Project Runway” has survived the move to Lifetime and Los Angeles. Heidi looks the same, Tim is still around, the challenges and overall format are basically the same. The biggest problem I’m having is the sporadic participation of Michael Kors and Nina Garcia. (I’m guessing they used to be able to just hop in a cab to judge the runway shows and it hasn’t worked out for them to hop on a flight every time.) They are definitely missed. Still, I like this show for the same reasons I always liked it: It’s fun to see what the designers come up with. That’s it! Deep, no?
Top Chef: I love this show. I don’t know why it works, since we obviously can’t taste, or even smell, any of the food that’s prepared. Somehow the combination of the personalities (although there aren’t many exciting people this season), the challenges, and seeing how much work goes into the preparation and presentation of a good dish makes for good TV.
I also watch “30 Rock,” which hasn’t started yet, and “Now” on PBS, which seems to not fit in on this list but I like for its non-hysterical coverage of various issues.
And on that note, off to watch “Glee,” then upstairs to read. Because let’s face it, even though I’ve now spent over an hour writing about television, a good book trumps most shows any day.

Dinnah
I don’t usually brag about dinner; frankly, there is usually nothing much to brag about. Not that we’re eating Hot Pockets over here, but it’s usually the standard grilled meat, stir-fried veggies and so on – tasty, but not something I need to share with the world.
But tonight, World, I nailed it, with a deceptively simple dinner of a mixed greens salad and a risotto with carrots, sage, white wine and lemon juice. The risotto was so good that I was eating the remnants out of the pan seconds before submerging it in water to soak.
It would be a bold move for me to take all the credit, though, since the carrots, sage, and greens were all from David’s garden. And that got me thinking…well, many things.
First of all, a tip of the hat to Farmer Cancel, a guy who had never lived anywhere other than an apartment until after we were married. (If you ask him the story of his life from birth to college it goes something like this: Born in the Bronx, then moved to Queens, lived in Queens, Catholic school in Queens, Queens College, in Queens.)
When David started baking bread last year I warned him, “You better be careful, Queens might not like this.” Then, this summer, when the garden was planted, I told him that Queens had called to say that, sadly, he was disowned. When you eat a vegetable in Queens it’s supposed to have come from a can, or it might not be safe.
I just turned my head to look out the window at the garden. In the six raised beds (yes, David built them) I’m looking at loads of carrots, huge heirloom tomato plants (all green tomatoes, but a couple of weeks from now I’ll be trying to give them to the UPS man and random people walking by with their dogs), beets, broccoli, lettuce, and a bunch of Nasturtiums. We’ve already been through the peas – delicious, and so far from a supermarket pea, it is almost ridiculous for them to have the same name – as well as the month when we had so much lettuce that we sent a message to the neighborhood email list, pretty much begging people to come take some.
Now we’re two-thirds of the way through The Summer That Wasn’t (even if you don’t live in New England, you probably heard about how it was cold and rainy until recently, and now it’s hot and humid) and we’re gearing up for a two-week vacation that will put us on the fast track to September.
I know we can coast through that month with some carrots and beets but, after that, we’re winding down and looking ahead to another absurdly long, barely tolerable winter. A winter where our CSA winter share will provide us with potatoes and garlic and onions and some other root vegetables. So…that’s good.
But if I’m being honest, what I’m realizing now is that this little garden – along with Barbara Kingsolver and my CSA – has changed the way I think about food and I don’t want to go back. I love knowing my farmers, the CSA guys (one of whom is getting married on the farm next weekend and invited us to the big party) and my own, personal farmer.
I love having the beds outside which, as I’ve said, I take no credit for (in my defense, David went all David with computer-generated, color-coded planting charts and grow lights in the basement and there wasn’t a hell of a lot I could do). I adore going outside to pick my salad in the evening, minutes before I eat it. I don’t want it to end.
If you know me well, you might be smiling, thinking that I didn’t really need another reason to hate winter. That’s how I feel, too. But let’s not think about that just yet. We still have a few good weeks of gathering our dinner outside the door.
Anyway, it’s a nice night, and my farmer just refilled my wine. Everyone’s happy after a good dinner.
Filed under Uncategorized | Comments Off






